Odinkalu Slams N950m Suit Against El-Rufai, 4 Others

0
154
…America Bar Association, others to give counsel to Court
KADUNA, North-West, Nigeria – Former Chairman, National Human Rights Commission, (NHRC), Prof. Chidi Anselem Odinkalu, on Wednesday, June 24, 2020 has dragged Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai and four others before a Kaduna Federal High Court over an alleged violation on his Human Rights and is asking for N950 million in compensation among others.
Meanwhile, the American Bar Association, South African based, United Nations expert on Human Rights, Mr. Mini Kai, Global Rights and Open Society for Justice Initiative have all indicated interest to serve  as advisers and friends to the court  (amicus curiea)  in the case which came up for Hearing yesterday.
In a Suit No: FHC/KD/CS/97/19
Odinkalu had approach the court, presided by  Justice Peter Mallong Hoommuk, through his Counsel, Barrister Gloria Mabeia Ballason chargee el-Rufai, the Inspector General of Police, Kaduna State Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), the  Attorney General of Kaduna State and Kaduna State Commissioner of Police, as 2nd, 5th, 1st, 3rd, and 4th Respondents to the case.
It could be recalled that the Odinkalu had aired his doubt on Channels TV over claims by El-Rufai in February 2019, where he alleged that 66 and, later 130 Fulani were killed by native Adara and  said of the allegation as inciting and unbecoming of a governor. He also  challenged el-Rufai to show proof.
Few days later, then Kaduna State Commissioner of Police, Ahmad Abdullraman, clarified that there was no evidence to that claim of the governor. But El-Rufai, through the Kaduna State DPP ordered the arrest and prosecution of Odinkalu in trail that his lawyer, Ballason said was a secret trail, and did not follow due judicial process and abused on his Fundamental Human Rights.
Odinkalu is seeking, among others: A declaration that, “the efforts by the Respondents to seek to or in fact influence, initiate or procure the prosecution of the Applicant for the honest expression of his views in the interview he granted to Channels Television, Abuja on or about the 16th, February, 2019 violates the Applicants rights to personal liberty and free expression under sections 35 and 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN)
“A declaration that the attempt by the Respondents to procure prosecution of the Applicant before the courts in Kaduna state for a broadcast emission on a Television meduim in in Abuja operated by license on National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC), is outside the jurisdiction of a state, given that broadcasting is a subject of under item 66 of the Exclusive Legislative List, and therefore, unconstitutional.
“A declaration that it is wrong in law and gross violation of the rights of the Applicant to fair hearing, procedural fairness in law in the form of due process, a fair and impartial trial for a direct criminal complaint to be filed against the Applicant without him being served with the said direct criminal complaint and a subsequent  ex-parte order obtained to section 36 of the CFRN Rights.
“An Oder for compensation in the sum N200m against the  1st and 3rd Respondents
“An order for compensation in the sum of N250 million for injury to character, self-reputation, esteem, feeling of pride and international reputation of the Applicant.
“An order in the sum of N500m only to the 2nd Defendant who is notorious for serial abuse of fundamental rights.
“The cost of the suit.
“10% interest per annum on damages until total and final liquidation of same.
“Any other relief(s) that the court may seem fit to make in the circumstances.”
Explaining the interest of the American Bar Association and others, Ballason said: ” usually when you have a case of Fundamental Human Rights like this, the Court can grant leave for such experts to participate.
“Their role is to provide guidance and and counseling on the case such that democracy and good governance can be achieved. As experts with global knowledge on matters like this they shall enrich the process with their knowledge and experinces so that the best outcome shall be produced. They are coming as neutral bodies. And it is good that the Judge has so allowed them to participate,” she said.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here